State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. Vs. M/s. Universal Exporters & Anr.
EmailAppeal: Civil Appeal No. 2535 of 1991
(From the Judgment and Order dated 19.8.83 of the Allahabad High Court in C.M.W.P. No. 48 of 1983)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 19.8.83 of the Allahabad High Court in C.M.W.P. No. 48 of 1983)
Petitioner: State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Respondent: M/s. Universal Exporters & Anr.
Apeal: Civil Appeal No. 2535 of 1991
(From the Judgment and Order dated 19.8.83 of the Allahabad High Court in C.M.W.P. No. 48 of 1983)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 19.8.83 of the Allahabad High Court in C.M.W.P. No. 48 of 1983)
Judges: S.P. BHARUCHA & M. JAGANNADHA RAO, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Sep 10, 1997
Appearances:
Mr. R.C. Verma, Mr.C.D. Singh, and Mr. R.B. Misra, Advocates for the appellants.
Mr. R.F.Nariman, Senior Advocate ( A.C.) for the Respondents.
Head Note:
SALES TAX
U.P. Sales Tax Act 1948
Sections 3AA & 3AAA – Presumption in respect of certain sales under section 3AAA can be rebutted by dealer – Dealer to file a form under Rule 12A(5) – Form 3A – Sales tax officer to issue blank forms if satisfied about requisition being genuine and reasonable. Held arrogation of the authority to reject application for blank form was improper and is quashed. Assessing authority to satisfy itself only after receipt of duly filled in form to satisfy whether presumption under section 3AAA is rebutted – Appeal dismissed.
Held:
Sections 3-AAA provides for a presumption in respect of certain sales. It states that were goods are liable to tax under the Act only at the point of sale to a consumer, every sale by a dealer to a registered dealer who does not purchase the goods for re-sale within the state or in the course of inter-state trade or commerce, in the form and condition in which he has purchased them, or to any person other than a registered dealer shall be deemed to be a sale to the consumer. The section, however, goes on to provide that the aforesaid presumption may be rebutted when it states that the dealer may prove otherwise to the satisfaction of the assessing authority. For such purpose the dealer is re-quired to furnish to the assessing authorities a declaration from the purchasing dealer in such form and manner and within such period as may be prescribed. Rule 12-A(5) empowers the sales Tax Officer to issue blank forms in this behalf (which are entitled Form iii-A) if he is satisfied that the requisition in that behalf”is genuine and reasonable”.
That the Sales Tax Officer may satisfy himself that the requisition for the blank Forms is genuine and reasonable does not empower him to pre-judge the issue as to whether or not the presumption under section 3-AAA can be rebutted. That is something that the assessing authority must consider only after the blank form has been issued and it has been duly filled in and submitted, along with such other proof as the dealer adduces. It is only then that the assessing authority may consider whether such proof, along with the filled in form is sufficient to rebut the presumption drawn under the provision.
The arrogation of the authority to reject the assessee’s applica-tion for blank Forms by the Sales Tax Officer on the ground that the concerned transactions entered into by the assesses were by way of export of leather was improper and must be quashed. (para 5, 6 & 7)
JUDGEMENT:
O R D E R
1. Section 3AA and Section 3AAA of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Acts, 1984, at the relevant time read thus :
“3-AA. Rate and point of tax in respect of certain goods – sub-ject to the provisions of Section 3-D, the turnover in respect of goods declared under Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Acts, 1958 (Act 74 of 1956) to be of special important in inter-state trade or commerce shall not be liable to tax except at the point of sale by a dealer to the consumer and the rate of tax shall be such, not exceeding the maximum rate for the time being specified in Section 15 of the said Act, as the State Government may, by notification in the Gazette, declares”. “3-AAA: Presumption regarding certain sales. Where goods are liable to tax under this Act only at the point of sale to the consumer, every sale by a dealer
(a) to a registered dealer who does not purchase them for re-sale within the State or in the course of inter-State trade or com-merce in the same form and condition in which he has purchased them or,
(b) to any person other than a registered dealer,
Shall be deemed to be a sale to the consumer, unless the dealer proves otherwise to the satisfaction of the assessing authority and, for the purpose, also furnishes to the assessing authority such declaration obtained from the purchasing dealer, in such form and manner and within such period, as may be prescribed”.
Rule 12A(5) of the U.P. Sales Tax rules read thus :
“If the Sales Tax Officer is satisfied that the requisition of the dealer for blank forms is genuine and reasonable, he may issue the same in such manner as he deem fit. If the fee paid is more than the fee payable for the number of forms issued, the balance shall be credited to the account of the dealer to be adjusted against any future issue of the forms”.
2. It appears that the assessee applied for a form to enable it to rebut the presumption under Section 3-AAA. The application in this behalf was not dealt with. The assessee thereupon filed a writ petition in the High Court at Allahabad. Pending the disposal of the writ petition, the Sales Tax Officer rejected the application as, in his opinion, the transac-tions entered into by the assessee were by way of export of leath-er. The writ petition was amended and the refusal was challenged.
3. Two learned Judges of the High Court having differed on the writ petition, it was referred to a third learned judge. The third learned judge agreed that the writ petition should be allowed. Hence, this appeal by special leave at the instance of the state.
4. The assessee not having appeared, we thought it necessary to appoint amicus curiae, and we are obliged to Mr. R.F. Nariman for having assisted the court as such.
5. Section 3-AAA provides for a presumption in respect of certain sales. It states that were goods are liable to tax under the Act only at the point of sale to a consumer, every sale by a dealer to a registered dealer who does not purchase the goods for re-sale within the state or in the course of inter-state trade or commerce, in the form and condition in which he has purchased them, or to any person other than a registered dealer shall be deemed to be a sale to the consumer. The Section, however, goes on to provide that the aforesaid presumption may be rebutted when it states that the dealer may prove otherwise to the satisfaction of the assessing authority. For such purpose the dealer is re-quired to furnish to the assessing authorities a declaration from the purchasing dealer in such form and manner and within such period as may be prescribed. Rule 12-A(5) empowers the Sales Tax Officer to issue blank forms in this behalf (which are entitled Form III-A) if he is satisfied that the requisition in that behalf “is genuine and reasonable”.
6. That the Sales Tax Officer may satisfy himself that the requi-sition for the blank Forms is genuine and reasonable does not empower him to pre-judge the issue as to whether or not the presumption under section 3-AAA can be rebutted. That is someth-ing that the assessing authority must consider only after the blank form has been issued and it has been duly filled in and submitted, along with such other proof as the dealer adduces. It is only then that the assessing authority may consider whether such proof, along with the filled in form is sufficient to rebut the presumption drawn under the provision.
7. The arrogation of the authority to reject the assessee’s application for blank Forms by the Sales tax Officer on the ground that the concerned transactions entered into by the asses-see were by way of export of leather was improper and must be quashed. After the blank forms are issued to the assessee and duly filled up and submitted along with such proof as the asses-see may adduce, it shall, of course, be open to the assessing authority to satisfy itself as to whether or not the presumption under Section 3-AAA stands rebutted.
8. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
1. Section 3AA and Section 3AAA of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Acts, 1984, at the relevant time read thus :
“3-AA. Rate and point of tax in respect of certain goods – sub-ject to the provisions of Section 3-D, the turnover in respect of goods declared under Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Acts, 1958 (Act 74 of 1956) to be of special important in inter-state trade or commerce shall not be liable to tax except at the point of sale by a dealer to the consumer and the rate of tax shall be such, not exceeding the maximum rate for the time being specified in Section 15 of the said Act, as the State Government may, by notification in the Gazette, declares”. “3-AAA: Presumption regarding certain sales. Where goods are liable to tax under this Act only at the point of sale to the consumer, every sale by a dealer
(a) to a registered dealer who does not purchase them for re-sale within the State or in the course of inter-State trade or com-merce in the same form and condition in which he has purchased them or,
(b) to any person other than a registered dealer,
Shall be deemed to be a sale to the consumer, unless the dealer proves otherwise to the satisfaction of the assessing authority and, for the purpose, also furnishes to the assessing authority such declaration obtained from the purchasing dealer, in such form and manner and within such period, as may be prescribed”.
Rule 12A(5) of the U.P. Sales Tax rules read thus :
“If the Sales Tax Officer is satisfied that the requisition of the dealer for blank forms is genuine and reasonable, he may issue the same in such manner as he deem fit. If the fee paid is more than the fee payable for the number of forms issued, the balance shall be credited to the account of the dealer to be adjusted against any future issue of the forms”.
2. It appears that the assessee applied for a form to enable it to rebut the presumption under Section 3-AAA. The application in this behalf was not dealt with. The assessee thereupon filed a writ petition in the High Court at Allahabad. Pending the disposal of the writ petition, the Sales Tax Officer rejected the application as, in his opinion, the transac-tions entered into by the assessee were by way of export of leath-er. The writ petition was amended and the refusal was challenged.
3. Two learned Judges of the High Court having differed on the writ petition, it was referred to a third learned judge. The third learned judge agreed that the writ petition should be allowed. Hence, this appeal by special leave at the instance of the state.
4. The assessee not having appeared, we thought it necessary to appoint amicus curiae, and we are obliged to Mr. R.F. Nariman for having assisted the court as such.
5. Section 3-AAA provides for a presumption in respect of certain sales. It states that were goods are liable to tax under the Act only at the point of sale to a consumer, every sale by a dealer to a registered dealer who does not purchase the goods for re-sale within the state or in the course of inter-state trade or commerce, in the form and condition in which he has purchased them, or to any person other than a registered dealer shall be deemed to be a sale to the consumer. The Section, however, goes on to provide that the aforesaid presumption may be rebutted when it states that the dealer may prove otherwise to the satisfaction of the assessing authority. For such purpose the dealer is re-quired to furnish to the assessing authorities a declaration from the purchasing dealer in such form and manner and within such period as may be prescribed. Rule 12-A(5) empowers the Sales Tax Officer to issue blank forms in this behalf (which are entitled Form III-A) if he is satisfied that the requisition in that behalf “is genuine and reasonable”.
6. That the Sales Tax Officer may satisfy himself that the requi-sition for the blank Forms is genuine and reasonable does not empower him to pre-judge the issue as to whether or not the presumption under section 3-AAA can be rebutted. That is someth-ing that the assessing authority must consider only after the blank form has been issued and it has been duly filled in and submitted, along with such other proof as the dealer adduces. It is only then that the assessing authority may consider whether such proof, along with the filled in form is sufficient to rebut the presumption drawn under the provision.
7. The arrogation of the authority to reject the assessee’s application for blank Forms by the Sales tax Officer on the ground that the concerned transactions entered into by the asses-see were by way of export of leather was improper and must be quashed. After the blank forms are issued to the assessee and duly filled up and submitted along with such proof as the asses-see may adduce, it shall, of course, be open to the assessing authority to satisfy itself as to whether or not the presumption under Section 3-AAA stands rebutted.
8. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
