State of M.P. Vs. Sudhir Pingle
EmailAppeal: Criminal Appeal No. 50 of 2000.
(Arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.2855 of 1999)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 24.2.99 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Crl. R. No. 613 of 1998)
(Arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.2855 of 1999)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 24.2.99 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Crl. R. No. 613 of 1998)
Petitioner: State of M.P.
Respondent: Sudhir Pingle
Apeal: Criminal Appeal No. 50 of 2000.
(Arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.2855 of 1999)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 24.2.99 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Crl. R. No. 613 of 1998)
(Arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.2855 of 1999)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 24.2.99 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Crl. R. No. 613 of 1998)
Judges: K.T. THOMAS & M.B. SHAH, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Jan 17, 2000
Head Note:
CRIMINAL LAWS
Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 120-B – Conspiracy – Inference – How to draw. Held that Inference can be drawn from available circumstantial evidence.
(Para 6)
JUDGEMENT:
