Sanjay Dutt Vs. he State Through C.B.I., Bombay
EmailAppeal: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Nos.3338-3339 of 1994
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos.1834-1835 of 1994
Petitioner: Sanjay Dutt
Respondent: he State Through C.B.I., Bombay
Apeal: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Nos.3338-3339 of 1994
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos.1834-1835 of 1994
Judges: B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, G.N. RAY & N.P.SINGH,JJ.
Date of Judgment: Sep 23, 1994
Head Note:
CRIMINAL LAW
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987:
Grant of Bail – The Court is not inclined to enlarge thepetitioner on bail at this juncture – Petitioner may make his request before designated court after his defence evidence is adduced at the trial.
JUDGEMENT:
ORDER
1. Pursuant to the direction of the Constitution Bench contained in its Judgment dated September 9, 1994, the bail petition was posted before us on 21st September, 1994. We heard Sri Kapil Sibal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Natarajan, learned counsel for the respondent fully.
2. We are not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this juncture. It is not necessary or advisable to say more than this stage. The petition is accordingly rejected.
3. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to renew his request for bail before the Designated Court after his defence evidence is adduced at the trial.
1. Pursuant to the direction of the Constitution Bench contained in its Judgment dated September 9, 1994, the bail petition was posted before us on 21st September, 1994. We heard Sri Kapil Sibal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Natarajan, learned counsel for the respondent fully.
2. We are not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this juncture. It is not necessary or advisable to say more than this stage. The petition is accordingly rejected.
3. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to renew his request for bail before the Designated Court after his defence evidence is adduced at the trial.
