NANAG RAM SHARMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN and ORS. .
EmailAppeal: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1546 OF 2015
Petitioner: NANAG RAM SHARMA
Respondent: STATE OF RAJASTHAN and ORS. .
Judges: ANIL R. DAVE , ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Date of Judgment: Nov 20, 2015
JUDGEMENT:
NON- CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1546 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.)No.6444 of 2015)
NANAG RAM SHARMA … APPELLANT(S)
VS.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
ANIL R. DAVE, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel. 2. Leave granted. 3. Crl.M.P.No.17416/2015 for correction is allowed. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the State has fairly stated that the State has no objection if the petitioner is heard by the High Court without being impleaded as a party before the High Court. 5. In the circumstances, the impugned order passed by the High Court is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall be permitted to appear and make his submissions without being impleaded as a party.
6. The appeal is allowed to the above extent.
…………..J. [ANIL R. DAVE]
…………..J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; 20th November, 2015.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1546 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.)No.6444 of 2015)
NANAG RAM SHARMA … APPELLANT(S)
VS.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
ANIL R. DAVE, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel. 2. Leave granted. 3. Crl.M.P.No.17416/2015 for correction is allowed. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the State has fairly stated that the State has no objection if the petitioner is heard by the High Court without being impleaded as a party before the High Court. 5. In the circumstances, the impugned order passed by the High Court is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall be permitted to appear and make his submissions without being impleaded as a party.
6. The appeal is allowed to the above extent.
…………..J. [ANIL R. DAVE]
…………..J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; 20th November, 2015.
