M/S ARTI SPINNING MILLS ETC.ETC Vs. STATE OF HARYANA and ANR
EmailAppeal: CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 1863-1865 OF 2016
Petitioner: M/S ARTI SPINNING MILLS ETC.ETC
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA and ANR
Judges: KURIAN JOSEPH , ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Date of Judgment: May 13, 2016
JUDGEMENT:
NON- CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 1863-1865 OF 2016
M/S ARTI SPINNING MILLS ETC.ETC. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J. This is in continuation of our Judgment dated 26.02.2016. It appears that one part of the Judgment is left out, which was to the effect that the compensation awarded in these cases is confined to the facts of the case and the same shall not have any precedential value. The Judgment dated 26.02.2016 is clarified accordingly. …………………..J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
…………………..J. [ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]
New Delhi; May 13, 2016.
CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 1863-1865 OF 2016
M/S ARTI SPINNING MILLS ETC.ETC. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J. This is in continuation of our Judgment dated 26.02.2016. It appears that one part of the Judgment is left out, which was to the effect that the compensation awarded in these cases is confined to the facts of the case and the same shall not have any precedential value. The Judgment dated 26.02.2016 is clarified accordingly. …………………..J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
…………………..J. [ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]
New Delhi; May 13, 2016.
