MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. RFDF MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE AND ORS. .
EmailAppeal: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8681 OF 2015
Petitioner: MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA
Respondent: RFDF MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE AND ORS. .
Judges: ANIL R. DAVE , ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Date of Judgment: Oct 15, 2015
JUDGEMENT:
NON- CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8681 OF 2015 (arising out of SLP(C)No.29443 of 2015)
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA … APPELLANT(S)
VS.
RFDF MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE AND ORS. … RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
ANIL R. DAVE, J.
1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. Looking at the facts of the case, in our opinion, interim relief ought not to have been granted by the High Court and respondent No.1 should not have been permitted to give admission to students. 4. Interim relief, granted by the High Court, is quashed and admission, if any given, shall stand cancelled. 5. We hope that the High Court will conclude the final hearing of the pending Writ Petition at an early date and the learned counsel appearing for the parties shall extend their cooperation to the Court so that the petition pending before the High Court can be decided at an early date. It is clarified that we are not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. 6. In view of the said fact the appeal is disposed of as allowed. No order as to costs. 7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
……………..J. [ANIL R. DAVE]
………………J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; 15th October, 2015.
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8681 OF 2015 (arising out of SLP(C)No.29443 of 2015)
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA … APPELLANT(S)
VS.
RFDF MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE AND ORS. … RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
ANIL R. DAVE, J.
1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. Looking at the facts of the case, in our opinion, interim relief ought not to have been granted by the High Court and respondent No.1 should not have been permitted to give admission to students. 4. Interim relief, granted by the High Court, is quashed and admission, if any given, shall stand cancelled. 5. We hope that the High Court will conclude the final hearing of the pending Writ Petition at an early date and the learned counsel appearing for the parties shall extend their cooperation to the Court so that the petition pending before the High Court can be decided at an early date. It is clarified that we are not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. 6. In view of the said fact the appeal is disposed of as allowed. No order as to costs. 7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
……………..J. [ANIL R. DAVE]
………………J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; 15th October, 2015.
