HARIHAR PRASAD PADARHA Vs. M/S. KANHA WILDERNESS LTD. .
EmailAppeal: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4905 OF 2015
Petitioner: HARIHAR PRASAD PADARHA
Respondent: M/S. KANHA WILDERNESS LTD. .
Judges: ANIL R. DAVE , V. GOPALA GOWDA
Date of Judgment: Aug 14, 2015
JUDGEMENT:
NON- CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4905 OF 2015
HARIHAR PRASAD PADARHA … APPELLANT(S)
VS.
M/S. KANHA WILDERNESS LTD. … RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
ANIL R. DAVE, J.
1. Admit. 2. Upon hearing the learned counsel and upon perusal of the reply filed by the respondent we find that possibly the allegation made in the appeal with regard to appeal being heard by less number of Members, might be correct. 3. Be that as it may, the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the matter is remitted for hearing again. 4. In the circumstances, the impugned order is quashed with a direction that the appeal shall be heard within four weeks from today. 5. The appeal is disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
7. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has assured this Court that the appellant shall not pray for adjournment unnecessarily.
…………..J. [ANIL R. DAVE]
…………..J. [V. GOPALA GOWDA] New Delhi; 14th August, 2015.
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4905 OF 2015
HARIHAR PRASAD PADARHA … APPELLANT(S)
VS.
M/S. KANHA WILDERNESS LTD. … RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
ANIL R. DAVE, J.
1. Admit. 2. Upon hearing the learned counsel and upon perusal of the reply filed by the respondent we find that possibly the allegation made in the appeal with regard to appeal being heard by less number of Members, might be correct. 3. Be that as it may, the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the matter is remitted for hearing again. 4. In the circumstances, the impugned order is quashed with a direction that the appeal shall be heard within four weeks from today. 5. The appeal is disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
7. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has assured this Court that the appellant shall not pray for adjournment unnecessarily.
…………..J. [ANIL R. DAVE]
…………..J. [V. GOPALA GOWDA] New Delhi; 14th August, 2015.
