Gulshan Schdeva & Anr. Vs. M/s. Sundial Communications Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
EmailAppeal: Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 5608 – 5609 of 2003 Etc.
(From the Judgment and Order dated 21. 3. 2003 and 25.3.2003 of the Bombay High Court in A. (Lodging) No. 236/2003 in Notice of Motion No. 783/2003 in Suit No. 767 of 2003)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 21. 3. 2003 and 25.3.2003 of the Bombay High Court in A. (Lodging) No. 236/2003 in Notice of Motion No. 783/2003 in Suit No. 767 of 2003)
Petitioner: Gulshan Schdeva & Anr.
Respondent: M/s. Sundial Communications Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Apeal: Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 5608 – 5609 of 2003 Etc.
(From the Judgment and Order dated 21. 3. 2003 and 25.3.2003 of the Bombay High Court in A. (Lodging) No. 236/2003 in Notice of Motion No. 783/2003 in Suit No. 767 of 2003)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 21. 3. 2003 and 25.3.2003 of the Bombay High Court in A. (Lodging) No. 236/2003 in Notice of Motion No. 783/2003 in Suit No. 767 of 2003)
Judges: S. Rajendra Babu & G.P. Mathur, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Nov 14, 2003
Appearances:
Mr. P.Chidambaram, Senior Advocate, Mr. A. Mariarputham, Ms. Aruna Mathur, Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Pratiba M. Singh, Ms. Anubha Arora, Mr. Kritiman Singh, Mr. Angad Chopra, Mr. Sashi Bhushan, Advocates with him for the Petitioners.
Mr. C.A. Sundram, Senior Advocate, Mr. Alamjit S. Nand, Advocate with him for the Respondents.
Mr. C.A. Sundram, Senior Advocate, Mr. Alamjit S. Nand, Advocate with him for the Respondents.
JUDGEMENT:
Rajendra Babu, J.
1. These matters arise out of an interim order passed by a learned single judge of the High Court and the Division Bench, on appeal, having dismissed the appeals.
2. Elaborate arguments have been addressed by the learned counsel on either side. It is unnecessary to examine the various questions raised in these petitions as these cases arise out of an interlocutory order. The High Court has adequately taken care for quick disposal of the original matter. Therefore, we decline to interfere with the order made by the High Court.
3. These petitions, therefore, stand dismissed. No costs.
1. These matters arise out of an interim order passed by a learned single judge of the High Court and the Division Bench, on appeal, having dismissed the appeals.
2. Elaborate arguments have been addressed by the learned counsel on either side. It is unnecessary to examine the various questions raised in these petitions as these cases arise out of an interlocutory order. The High Court has adequately taken care for quick disposal of the original matter. Therefore, we decline to interfere with the order made by the High Court.
3. These petitions, therefore, stand dismissed. No costs.
