DR. SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & OTHERS
EmailAppeal: WP (S/B) No.336 of 2011
Petitioner: DR. SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent: STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & OTHERS
Apeal: WP (S/B) No.336 of 2011
Judges: Barin Ghosh, C.J. U.C. Dhyani, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Aug 07, 2012
Appearances:
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent NO.1.
Ms. Sonia Chawla, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Sah, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
Mr. Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent NO.1.
Ms. Sonia Chawla, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Sah, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
JUDGEMENT:
JUDGEMENT:
The inquiry report has been brought on record by filing a supplementary counter affidavit. Petitioner is permitted to file an affidavit within two weeks from today indicating therein what prejudice did he suffer by reason of non-furnishing of the inquiry report before the disciplinary authority passed the order impugned.
List thereafter.
***********
The inquiry report has been brought on record by filing a supplementary counter affidavit. Petitioner is permitted to file an affidavit within two weeks from today indicating therein what prejudice did he suffer by reason of non-furnishing of the inquiry report before the disciplinary authority passed the order impugned.
List thereafter.
***********
