Basudev Pati Vs. State of Orissa & Anr.
EmailAppeal: Special Leave Petition (C) No.4084 of 1997
(From the Judgment and Order dated 6.12.1996 of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack in T.A.No. 610 of 1987)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 6.12.1996 of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack in T.A.No. 610 of 1987)
Petitioner: Basudev Pati
Respondent: State of Orissa & Anr.
Apeal: Special Leave Petition (C) No.4084 of 1997
(From the Judgment and Order dated 6.12.1996 of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack in T.A.No. 610 of 1987)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 6.12.1996 of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack in T.A.No. 610 of 1987)
Judges: K. RAMASWAMY & G.T. NANAVATI, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Mar 03, 1997
Appearances:
Janaranjan Das, K.N. Tripathy, D. Mohanty, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Head Note:
SERVICE AND LABOUR LAW
Fitment of salary in IAS on basis of revised salary as Lecturer post held prior to selection – Held service as lecturer is different from IAS and he cannot be permitted to have benefit of University Grants Commission scale in IAS and fitment in pay scale on that basis – Appeal dismissed.
Held:
We find no force in the contention. The service as a Lecturer is entirely different from the service of the Orissa Administrative Service. Merely because he happened to work earlier as a Lecturer and in the same pay scale which was subsequently revised, he cannot be permitted to have the benefit of U.G.C. scale in the Administrative Service and fitment in the pay-scale on that basis. That would create imbalance and gross infraction and distortion and would result in flood of claims of similarly situated persons under Article 39(d) of the Constitution. Under these circumstances, such a course cannot be permitted to be adopted. (Para 3)
JUDGEMENT:
O R D E R
1. This special leave petition is filed against the order of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal at Cuttack passed on December 6, 1996, in Transfer Application No.610/87.
2. Admittedly, the petitioner, while working as a Lecturer, had appeared in competitive examination and was selected to the Orissa Administrative Service. As Orissa Administrative Service, Class-II, his scale of pay was Rs.525-1150/-. Earlier, also when he worked as Lecturer, the scale of pay was Rs.525-1150/- which was subsequently revised by the University Grants Commission w.e.f. April 1, 1974 to Rs.700-1600/-. In that pay scale, his pay fixed at Rs.780. He was paid arrears of salary with retrospective effect from 1.1.1974. After he was selected and appointed to the Orissa Administrative Service, he sought protection of his last drawn pay and his upgraded fitment in the pay scale in the Orissa Administrative Service. The Tribunal has rejected the claim. Thus this special leave petition.
3. Shri Janaranjan Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contends that since the petitioner had been given the pay scale with retrospective effect from 1.1.1974, on his appointment to the Orissa Administrative Service, his last drawn pay need to be protected. As per the instructions of the Accountant General, his pay is entitled to be fixed at Rs.780/- in the pay scale in the service of Orissa Administrative Service. We find no force in the contention. The service as a Lecturer is entirely different from the service of the Orissa Administrative Service. Merely because he happened to work earlier as a Lecturer and in the same pay scale which was subsequently revised, he cannot be permitted to have the benefit of U.G.C. scale in the Administrative Service and fitment in the pay-scale on that basis. That would create imbalance and gross infraction and distortion and would result in flood of claims of similarly situated persons under Article 39(d) of the Constitution. Under these circumstances, such a course cannot be permitted to be adopted.
4. The special leave petition is dismissed accordingly.
1. This special leave petition is filed against the order of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal at Cuttack passed on December 6, 1996, in Transfer Application No.610/87.
2. Admittedly, the petitioner, while working as a Lecturer, had appeared in competitive examination and was selected to the Orissa Administrative Service. As Orissa Administrative Service, Class-II, his scale of pay was Rs.525-1150/-. Earlier, also when he worked as Lecturer, the scale of pay was Rs.525-1150/- which was subsequently revised by the University Grants Commission w.e.f. April 1, 1974 to Rs.700-1600/-. In that pay scale, his pay fixed at Rs.780. He was paid arrears of salary with retrospective effect from 1.1.1974. After he was selected and appointed to the Orissa Administrative Service, he sought protection of his last drawn pay and his upgraded fitment in the pay scale in the Orissa Administrative Service. The Tribunal has rejected the claim. Thus this special leave petition.
3. Shri Janaranjan Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contends that since the petitioner had been given the pay scale with retrospective effect from 1.1.1974, on his appointment to the Orissa Administrative Service, his last drawn pay need to be protected. As per the instructions of the Accountant General, his pay is entitled to be fixed at Rs.780/- in the pay scale in the service of Orissa Administrative Service. We find no force in the contention. The service as a Lecturer is entirely different from the service of the Orissa Administrative Service. Merely because he happened to work earlier as a Lecturer and in the same pay scale which was subsequently revised, he cannot be permitted to have the benefit of U.G.C. scale in the Administrative Service and fitment in the pay-scale on that basis. That would create imbalance and gross infraction and distortion and would result in flood of claims of similarly situated persons under Article 39(d) of the Constitution. Under these circumstances, such a course cannot be permitted to be adopted.
4. The special leave petition is dismissed accordingly.
