AJINATH GULAB SAYKAR Vs. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, AHMEDNAGAR
EmailAppeal: CIVIL APPEAL NO.7363 OF 2016
Petitioner: AJINATH GULAB SAYKAR
Respondent: EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, AHMEDNAGAR
Judges: KURIAN JOSEPH , ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Date of Judgment: Aug 08, 2016
JUDGEMENT:
NON- CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.7363 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (C)No.23564 of 2016 @ CC No.14534/2016)
AJINATH GULAB SAYKAR APPELLANT
VERSUS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, AHMEDNAGAR RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN,J.
Delay condoned. Leave granted. 3. In the nature of the order we propose to pass in this appeal, it is not necessary to go into the factual aspects of the case.
4. The appellant approached this Court aggrieved by the common judgment dated 10th April, 2013 and modified order dated 14th June, 2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that this case is covered by the judgment dated 11th September, 2015 of this Court passed in C.A. Nos.7137-7160 of 2015 titled Fula Bhoru Ughade, etc. etc. Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Ahmednagar wherein one time compensation has been enhanced from Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) to Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) and all others, similarly situated, have been paid the said amount.
5. In view of the above, it would be appropriate for the appellant to make a representation before the respondent within a period of one month. If such a representation is filed, the respondent shall consider the same in the light of the judgment referred to supra, and take the required action.
6. In case appellant is covered by the said judgment, the appellant shall also be given the same amount of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees One Lakh only) and it shall be done within a period of one month thereafter.
7. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
……………..J. [KURIAN JOSEPH]
………………..J. [ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN] NEW DELHI; AUGUST 08, 2016
CIVIL APPEAL NO.7363 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (C)No.23564 of 2016 @ CC No.14534/2016)
AJINATH GULAB SAYKAR APPELLANT
VERSUS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, AHMEDNAGAR RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN,J.
Delay condoned. Leave granted. 3. In the nature of the order we propose to pass in this appeal, it is not necessary to go into the factual aspects of the case.
4. The appellant approached this Court aggrieved by the common judgment dated 10th April, 2013 and modified order dated 14th June, 2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that this case is covered by the judgment dated 11th September, 2015 of this Court passed in C.A. Nos.7137-7160 of 2015 titled Fula Bhoru Ughade, etc. etc. Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Ahmednagar wherein one time compensation has been enhanced from Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) to Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) and all others, similarly situated, have been paid the said amount.
5. In view of the above, it would be appropriate for the appellant to make a representation before the respondent within a period of one month. If such a representation is filed, the respondent shall consider the same in the light of the judgment referred to supra, and take the required action.
6. In case appellant is covered by the said judgment, the appellant shall also be given the same amount of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees One Lakh only) and it shall be done within a period of one month thereafter.
7. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
……………..J. [KURIAN JOSEPH]
………………..J. [ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN] NEW DELHI; AUGUST 08, 2016
