DHARAM SINGH Vs. THE PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS
EmailAppeal: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8161 OF 2016
Petitioner: DHARAM SINGH
Respondent: THE PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS
Judges: KURIAN JOSEPH , SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
Date of Judgment: Aug 16, 2016
JUDGEMENT:
NON- CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8161 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 1021 OF 2015]
DHARAM SINGH Appellant(s)
VERSUS
THE PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J. 1. Leave granted.
2. The simple issue in this appeal is whether the appellant had 2555 days’ work charge status for the purpose of appointment as Assistant Lineman.
3. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents before this Court, it is admitted that though the appellant had joined as a labourer on daily wages on 04.04.1983 and though he was terminated with effect from 01.01.1986, the service of the appellant was thereafter converted from daily wages Chowkidar to work-charge Chowkidar as per order dated 16.12.1994. In the Industrial Dispute, the Labour Court, Patiala, in the Award dated 12.01.1994, directed reinstatement of the appellant with continuity of service. Thus, appellant has continuity of service from 12.01.1994.
4. In view of the continuity of service from 1994, the appellant satisfies the condition of 2555 days as work-charge employee. In that view of the matter, we set aside the impugned judgment and direct the respondents to consider the case of the appellant by treating him qualified and as having completed 2555 days on the appointed day for the purpose of appointment as Assistant Lineman.
5. With the above observations and directions, the appeal is allowed.
6. We make it clear that this Judgment is rendered on the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. No costs.
…………………..J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
…………………..J. [ SHIVA KIRTI SINGH ]
New Delhi; August 16, 2016.
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8161 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 1021 OF 2015]
DHARAM SINGH Appellant(s)
VERSUS
THE PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J. 1. Leave granted.
2. The simple issue in this appeal is whether the appellant had 2555 days’ work charge status for the purpose of appointment as Assistant Lineman.
3. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents before this Court, it is admitted that though the appellant had joined as a labourer on daily wages on 04.04.1983 and though he was terminated with effect from 01.01.1986, the service of the appellant was thereafter converted from daily wages Chowkidar to work-charge Chowkidar as per order dated 16.12.1994. In the Industrial Dispute, the Labour Court, Patiala, in the Award dated 12.01.1994, directed reinstatement of the appellant with continuity of service. Thus, appellant has continuity of service from 12.01.1994.
4. In view of the continuity of service from 1994, the appellant satisfies the condition of 2555 days as work-charge employee. In that view of the matter, we set aside the impugned judgment and direct the respondents to consider the case of the appellant by treating him qualified and as having completed 2555 days on the appointed day for the purpose of appointment as Assistant Lineman.
5. With the above observations and directions, the appeal is allowed.
6. We make it clear that this Judgment is rendered on the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. No costs.
…………………..J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
…………………..J. [ SHIVA KIRTI SINGH ]
New Delhi; August 16, 2016.
