LAL BABU DAS and ORS. Vs. OIL INDIA LTD. and ANR. .
EmailAppeal: CIVIL APPEAL NOS.8632-8634 OF 2010
Petitioner: LAL BABU DAS and ORS.
Respondent: OIL INDIA LTD. and ANR. .
Judges: ANIL R. DAVE , SHIVA KIRTI SINGH , ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Date of Judgment: Jan 14, 2016
JUDGEMENT:
NON- CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.8632-8634 OF 2010
LAL BABU DAS & ORS. … APPELLANT(S)
VS.
OIL INDIA LTD. & ANR. … RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel. 2. Upon perusal of the record and the sale instances, we find that the valuation arrived at by the Reference Court was more just and therefore, we set aside the impugned judgment delivered by the High Court and restore the order passed by the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984. 3. The appeals stand disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
…………J. [ANIL R. DAVE]
……………..J. [SHIVA KIRTI SINGH]
……………..J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; 14th January, 2016.
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.8632-8634 OF 2010
LAL BABU DAS & ORS. … APPELLANT(S)
VS.
OIL INDIA LTD. & ANR. … RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel. 2. Upon perusal of the record and the sale instances, we find that the valuation arrived at by the Reference Court was more just and therefore, we set aside the impugned judgment delivered by the High Court and restore the order passed by the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984. 3. The appeals stand disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
…………J. [ANIL R. DAVE]
……………..J. [SHIVA KIRTI SINGH]
……………..J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; 14th January, 2016.
