Motamarri Venkata Seshavastaram Vs. Devata Sita.
EmailAppeal: Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11654 of 1986.
(From the Judgment and Order dated 26.6.1986 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in C.R.P.No.4402/82.)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 26.6.1986 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in C.R.P.No.4402/82.)
Petitioner: Motamarri Venkata Seshavastaram
Respondent: Devata Sita.
Apeal: Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11654 of 1986.
(From the Judgment and Order dated 26.6.1986 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in C.R.P.No.4402/82.)
(From the Judgment and Order dated 26.6.1986 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in C.R.P.No.4402/82.)
Judges: E.S.VENKATARAMIAH & M.M.DUTT, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Mar 05, 1987
Appearances:
Mr. M.A. Firoz, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Ms. C.K. Suchareta, Advocate for the Respondents.
Head Note:
RENT LAW
Irregular deposit of rent – Satisfactory reason – Delay in depositing the rent in Court condoned.
JUDGEMENT:
1. Special leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. We are satisfied that the appellant has given satisfactory reason for the irregular deposit of rent. So we set aside the orders passed by the High Court on 26-6-86, by the Subordinate Judge on 2-11-82 and by the Rent Controller on 28-8-81 and condone the delay in depositing the rents in Court. The case is remanded to the Rent Controller to dispose it of in accordance with merits within four months. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.
2. We are satisfied that the appellant has given satisfactory reason for the irregular deposit of rent. So we set aside the orders passed by the High Court on 26-6-86, by the Subordinate Judge on 2-11-82 and by the Rent Controller on 28-8-81 and condone the delay in depositing the rents in Court. The case is remanded to the Rent Controller to dispose it of in accordance with merits within four months. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.
