Ram Dass Ram. Vs. State of Bihar & Anr.
EmailAppeal: Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 519 of 1985.
Petitioner: Ram Dass Ram.
Respondent: State of Bihar & Anr.
Apeal: Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 519 of 1985.
Judges: A.P. SEN & M.M. DUTT, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Jan 27, 1987
Head Note:
CRIMINAL LAW:
Indian Penal Code, 1860; Sections 34, 147, 148, 302, 307, 323, 324 and 327 – Habeas Corpus – After orders of acquittal by High Court and Additional Sessions Judge, the petitioner instead of being released was transferred to another Jail – There was no warrant for detaining the petitioner and it was directed that he be released forthwith.
JUDGEMENT:
ORDER
1. In this petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution for grant of a writ of habeas corpus, the only question is whether the detention of the petitioner at the Central Jail, Buxur is without any lawful authority. It appears from the counter – affidavit of the Superintendent, District Jail, Arrah that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Buxur had remanded the petitioner to the Central Jail, Buxur in the year 1978 in connection with case registered under GR 476/78 pertaining to commission of offence punishable under Sub-sections 147, 148, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Thereafter, the petitioner on the strength of a production warrant was transferred to the District Jail, Arrah to stand his trial in Sessions case No. 75/79 in the Court of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Arrah. The petitioner was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge by his judgment dated August 21, 1980 for having committed an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to imprisonment for life. On appeal being preferred, the High Court by its judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 371/80 allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment and conviction recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and acquitted the petitioner. Despite the release warrant issued by the High Court, the petitioner was continued to be detained at the District Jail, Arrah since he had to stand his trial before the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Arrah in Session Case No. 86/82 for having committed alleged offences under ss. 307 and 327, both read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Sessions Judge by his judgment dated August 14, 1986 recorded an order of acquittal and directed the release of the petitioner unless he was wanted in some other case. After the disposal of these cases, the petitioner instead of being released was transferred from the District Jail, Arrah to the Central Jail, Buxur on November 30, 1986 i.e after this Court had on November 10, 1986 issued notice to the Government, on the strength of a production warrant issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Buxur to face his trial under SS. 147, 148, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there can be no doubt that the petitioner is being wrongfully detained at the Central Jail, Buxur without any lawful justification. As already stated, he had been acquitted of the charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the High Court in one case and thereafter by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Arrah of the charge under SS.307 and 324, both read with Section 34 in another case, Thereafter there was no warrant for detaining him in jail. It is unfortunate that the learned Judicial Magistrate, Buxur without applying his mind to the facts of the case, should have for the mere asking issued a production warrant. The petitioner has been in jail for more than eight years and even if he were to be convicted for having committed the alleged offences punishable under Sub-Section 147, 148, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, he would have in the meanwhile served out the sentence.
3. The writ petition is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the petitioner be released forthwith. The proceedings before the Judicial Magistrate, Buxur are quashed.
Petition allowed.
1. In this petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution for grant of a writ of habeas corpus, the only question is whether the detention of the petitioner at the Central Jail, Buxur is without any lawful authority. It appears from the counter – affidavit of the Superintendent, District Jail, Arrah that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Buxur had remanded the petitioner to the Central Jail, Buxur in the year 1978 in connection with case registered under GR 476/78 pertaining to commission of offence punishable under Sub-sections 147, 148, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Thereafter, the petitioner on the strength of a production warrant was transferred to the District Jail, Arrah to stand his trial in Sessions case No. 75/79 in the Court of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Arrah. The petitioner was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge by his judgment dated August 21, 1980 for having committed an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to imprisonment for life. On appeal being preferred, the High Court by its judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 371/80 allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment and conviction recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and acquitted the petitioner. Despite the release warrant issued by the High Court, the petitioner was continued to be detained at the District Jail, Arrah since he had to stand his trial before the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Arrah in Session Case No. 86/82 for having committed alleged offences under ss. 307 and 327, both read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Sessions Judge by his judgment dated August 14, 1986 recorded an order of acquittal and directed the release of the petitioner unless he was wanted in some other case. After the disposal of these cases, the petitioner instead of being released was transferred from the District Jail, Arrah to the Central Jail, Buxur on November 30, 1986 i.e after this Court had on November 10, 1986 issued notice to the Government, on the strength of a production warrant issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Buxur to face his trial under SS. 147, 148, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there can be no doubt that the petitioner is being wrongfully detained at the Central Jail, Buxur without any lawful justification. As already stated, he had been acquitted of the charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the High Court in one case and thereafter by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Arrah of the charge under SS.307 and 324, both read with Section 34 in another case, Thereafter there was no warrant for detaining him in jail. It is unfortunate that the learned Judicial Magistrate, Buxur without applying his mind to the facts of the case, should have for the mere asking issued a production warrant. The petitioner has been in jail for more than eight years and even if he were to be convicted for having committed the alleged offences punishable under Sub-Section 147, 148, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, he would have in the meanwhile served out the sentence.
3. The writ petition is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the petitioner be released forthwith. The proceedings before the Judicial Magistrate, Buxur are quashed.
Petition allowed.
