Dakshaben B. Patel Vs. The Administrator, U.T. of Daman & Diu & 4 Ors.
EmailAppeal: Civil Appeal NO. 10539 Of 1995
(Arising out of SLP (C) No.13887 of 1995)
(Arising out of SLP (C) No.13887 of 1995)
Petitioner: Dakshaben B. Patel
Respondent: The Administrator, U.T. of Daman & Diu & 4 Ors.
Apeal: Civil Appeal NO. 10539 Of 1995
(Arising out of SLP (C) No.13887 of 1995)
(Arising out of SLP (C) No.13887 of 1995)
Judges: K. RAMASWAMY & B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Nov 20, 1995
Head Note:
SERVICE AND LABOUR LAW
Regularisation
Regularisation – Appellant obtained the M.Phil degree within the time extended by the Tribunal – Respondents directed to refer the case of the appellant to the UPSC for regularisation in accordance with the Rules.
D
JUDGEMENT:
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. The Tribunal, vide order dated January 13, 1992 with the consent of the counsel for the respondents, had extended six months’ time to obtain the M. Phil Degree. The Notification dated July 6, 1992 clearly shows that the appellant has obtained the degree in M. Phil and she is one of the candidates declared by the Board of Examiners as eligible for degree of M. Phil in Economics. Under these circumstances, the appeal is allowed and O.A. stands disposed of.
3. Respondents are directed to refer the case of the appellant for regularisation to the U.P.S.C. which would be done according to rules.
1. Leave granted.
2. The Tribunal, vide order dated January 13, 1992 with the consent of the counsel for the respondents, had extended six months’ time to obtain the M. Phil Degree. The Notification dated July 6, 1992 clearly shows that the appellant has obtained the degree in M. Phil and she is one of the candidates declared by the Board of Examiners as eligible for degree of M. Phil in Economics. Under these circumstances, the appeal is allowed and O.A. stands disposed of.
3. Respondents are directed to refer the case of the appellant for regularisation to the U.P.S.C. which would be done according to rules.
