State of U.P. & Anr. etc. etc. Vs. Rajendra Singh Malhan etc. etc.
EmailAppeal: Civil Appeal Nos. 355-59 of 1994
(Arising out of Special Leave Petitions Nos. 5249, 6443, 7684, 16261 and 15556 of 1993).
(Arising out of Special Leave Petitions Nos. 5249, 6443, 7684, 16261 and 15556 of 1993).
Petitioner: State of U.P. & Anr. etc. etc.
Respondent: Rajendra Singh Malhan etc. etc.
Apeal: Civil Appeal Nos. 355-59 of 1994
(Arising out of Special Leave Petitions Nos. 5249, 6443, 7684, 16261 and 15556 of 1993).
(Arising out of Special Leave Petitions Nos. 5249, 6443, 7684, 16261 and 15556 of 1993).
Judges: K. RAMASWAMY & N.P. SINGH, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Jan 25, 1994
Head Note:
SERVICE AND LABOUR LAW
U.P. Non-Technical (Class-II) Service (Reservation of Vacancies for Demobilised Officers) Rules, 1973:
Rule 3(1) and Rule 3(b) of U.P. Non-Technical (Class- II/Group’B’) Services (Appointment of Demobilised Officers) Rules, 1980 – Validity of – Appeals allowed in terms of JT 1994 (1) SC 187.
JUDGEMENT:
N.P. SINGH, J. :
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals have been filed on behalf of the State of U.P. for setting aside the judgments and orders passed by the High Court in different writ applications filed on behalf of the respondents of the appeals, for direction similar to the direction given by the High Court in favour of the aforesaid Shri Vinod Kumar Kharbanda. Some of the writ applications were allowed in terms of the judgment of the High Court, in the case of Shri Kharbanda. The other writ applications were disposed of directing the State Government to consider the representations filed by writ petitioners in the light of the judgment of the High Court in the case of Shri Kharbanda. As we have set aside the judgment of the High Court in the case of Shri Kharbanda, these appeals are allowed and different judgments and order of the High Court are set-aside.
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals have been filed on behalf of the State of U.P. for setting aside the judgments and orders passed by the High Court in different writ applications filed on behalf of the respondents of the appeals, for direction similar to the direction given by the High Court in favour of the aforesaid Shri Vinod Kumar Kharbanda. Some of the writ applications were allowed in terms of the judgment of the High Court, in the case of Shri Kharbanda. The other writ applications were disposed of directing the State Government to consider the representations filed by writ petitioners in the light of the judgment of the High Court in the case of Shri Kharbanda. As we have set aside the judgment of the High Court in the case of Shri Kharbanda, these appeals are allowed and different judgments and order of the High Court are set-aside.
