Union of India & Ors. Vs. Ranbir Singh Yadav & Ors.
EmailAppeal: Civil Appeal No. of 1987.
(Arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 4259/87)
(Arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 4259/87)
Petitioner: Union of India & Ors.
Respondent: Ranbir Singh Yadav & Ors.
Apeal: Civil Appeal No. of 1987.
(Arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 4259/87)
(Arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 4259/87)
Judges: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH & K.N. SINGH, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Oct 27, 1987
Head Note:
CIVIL SERVICE
Promotion – Order of Tribunal promoting the respondent set aside – Departmental Promotion Committee to consider the case of the respondent in the light of the finding recorded by the Tribunal – Respondent to get all consequential benefits if promoted.
Cases Reffered:
1. Mysore and Anr. v. Syed Mysore and Ors. 1968 (3) S.C.R. 363
2. State Bank of India v. Mohd. Moinuddom A.I.R. 1987 Supreme Court 1889
2. State Bank of India v. Mohd. Moinuddom A.I.R. 1987 Supreme Court 1889
JUDGEMENT:
ORDER:
1. Special Leave granted.
2. The appeal is heard. Following the decisions of the Court in STATE OF MYSORE AND ANR. V. SYED MAHMOOD AND ORS. 1968 (3) S.C.R. 363 and STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. MOHD. MOINUDDIN A.I.R. 1987 Supreme Court 1889, we set aside the direction given by the Central Administrative Tribunal to the union of India and Other respondents before the Tribunal to promote the first respondent in this appeal and to pay him the consequential benefits consequent upon his inclusion in the promotion list and direct the Departmental Promotion Committee entrusted with the duty of making selection of officers for promotion to the Cadre of ‘F’ (Executive) to consider the case of respondent No.1 in the light of the findings recorded by the Central Administrative Tribunal. If the respondent is promoted he will be entitled to all consequential benefits. The selection committee shall consider the case of the respondent No.1 as directed above within four months. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Appeal allowed.
1. Special Leave granted.
2. The appeal is heard. Following the decisions of the Court in STATE OF MYSORE AND ANR. V. SYED MAHMOOD AND ORS. 1968 (3) S.C.R. 363 and STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. MOHD. MOINUDDIN A.I.R. 1987 Supreme Court 1889, we set aside the direction given by the Central Administrative Tribunal to the union of India and Other respondents before the Tribunal to promote the first respondent in this appeal and to pay him the consequential benefits consequent upon his inclusion in the promotion list and direct the Departmental Promotion Committee entrusted with the duty of making selection of officers for promotion to the Cadre of ‘F’ (Executive) to consider the case of respondent No.1 in the light of the findings recorded by the Central Administrative Tribunal. If the respondent is promoted he will be entitled to all consequential benefits. The selection committee shall consider the case of the respondent No.1 as directed above within four months. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Appeal allowed.
