Mushtaq Beg and Ors. Vs. The State of U.P.
EmailAppeal: SLP (Criminal) No. 686 of 1987.
(From the judgment and order dated 23-2-1987 of the High Court of Allahabad in Crl. Misc.Case No. 78/87.)
(From the judgment and order dated 23-2-1987 of the High Court of Allahabad in Crl. Misc.Case No. 78/87.)
Petitioner: Mushtaq Beg and Ors.
Respondent: The State of U.P.
Apeal: SLP (Criminal) No. 686 of 1987.
(From the judgment and order dated 23-2-1987 of the High Court of Allahabad in Crl. Misc.Case No. 78/87.)
(From the judgment and order dated 23-2-1987 of the High Court of Allahabad in Crl. Misc.Case No. 78/87.)
Judges: A.P. SEN & V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI, JJ.
Date of Judgment: Apr 01, 1987
Appearances:
Mr. Mahabir Singh, Senior Advocate, Mr. N.S.Malik, Advocate and Mr. D.K.Garg, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Head Note:
TRANSFER OF CASE
Allegations against Sessions Judge – False and frivolous application – Growing tendency of terrorising the Judges by making wild allegations against them casting aspersions and making baseless imputations – Petitioners to deposit Rs. 5000/- by way of costs.
JUDGEMENT:
O R D E R
This is a false and frivolous application making wild allegations against the learned Sessions Judge, who is known for his integrity. The High Court while rejecting the transfer application has observed that nothing has come to its notice during all these years which could cause any doubt about the probity and conduct of the learned Sessions Judge. We view with great concern the growing tendency of terrorising the Judges by making wild allegations against them casting aspersions and making baseless imputations. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. We direct that the petitioners shall deposit Rs. 5,000/- in this Court by way of costs within three weeks from today. The said amount shall be credited to the account of the Supreme Court Legal Aid Society. The amount, if not paid, shall be recovered by attachment and sale of the properties of the petitioners.
Petition dismissed.
This is a false and frivolous application making wild allegations against the learned Sessions Judge, who is known for his integrity. The High Court while rejecting the transfer application has observed that nothing has come to its notice during all these years which could cause any doubt about the probity and conduct of the learned Sessions Judge. We view with great concern the growing tendency of terrorising the Judges by making wild allegations against them casting aspersions and making baseless imputations. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. We direct that the petitioners shall deposit Rs. 5,000/- in this Court by way of costs within three weeks from today. The said amount shall be credited to the account of the Supreme Court Legal Aid Society. The amount, if not paid, shall be recovered by attachment and sale of the properties of the petitioners.
Petition dismissed.
