DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . Vs. VIJAY DHAWAN HUF AND ORS. .
EmailAppeal: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8533 OF 2016
Petitioner: DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .
Respondent: VIJAY DHAWAN HUF AND ORS. .
Judges: KURIAN JOSEPH , ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Date of Judgment: Aug 31, 2016
JUDGEMENT:
NON- CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8533 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.23727 of 2015)
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY … PETITIONER(S)
VS.
VIJAY DHAWAN HUF AND ORS. … RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8727 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.28306 of 2015)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted. 2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil)No.8467 of 2015. 3. These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed. 4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.
5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession, shall return the physical possession of the land to the original land owner. 6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
……………J. [KURIAN JOSEPH]
…………………..J. [ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN] New Delhi; August 31, 2016.
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8533 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.23727 of 2015)
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY … PETITIONER(S)
VS.
VIJAY DHAWAN HUF AND ORS. … RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8727 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.28306 of 2015)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted. 2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil)No.8467 of 2015. 3. These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed. 4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.
5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession, shall return the physical possession of the land to the original land owner. 6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
……………J. [KURIAN JOSEPH]
…………………..J. [ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN] New Delhi; August 31, 2016.
